![]() This is the problem: you're not using Scripture to develop a theology of Scripture. "For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled." When you say "and not to every little detail" you're rejecting the religious epistemology they held to, which was based upon Matthew 5:18: Garnet Milne, “Has the Bible been kept pure?” (pp. 5:18 to confirm the Scripture’s testimony of their religious epistemology.” Moreover, they appealed to proof texts such as Matt. They did not mean pure in sense or in doctrine only, but in words and sentences. ![]() They stressed that the original language texts which had been immediately inspired by God were extant, and that they were pure. But they were confident they could be resolved by internal considerations including consulting the Old Testament. "They did not deny that some textual decisions had to be made from the variants evident in the New Testament copies or that there were numerical and other minor blemishes in the copies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |